Pediatric Cutaneous Warts and Verrucae: An Update

RSS
LinkedIn
Share
Copy link
URL has been copied successfully!

By Ivan Bristow, PhD, FFPM, RCPS (Glasg)

Plantar warts have plagued humans for thousands of years, but newer therapies, including immunotherapy and microwave treatments, offer promise in improving therapeutic outcomes for these frustrating challenges. 

Warts and verrucae are benign growths occurring in the skin and mucous membranes due to infection with various strains of the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV). Depending on their location and morphology they may be referred to as common, plane, flat, plantar, or genital warts. This paper aims to review recent evidence from published reviews and other research regarding cutaneous (non-genital) warts in children with a specific focus, where possible, on plantar lesions (verrucae).

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Warts

The cutaneous manifestations of HPV infection are cutaneous warts and verrucae, which have been shown to be unusual before the age of 4 but most prevalent in secondary school-aged children. A cross-sectional study of the hands and feet of 1465 children aged between 4 and 15 from 4 Dutch schools showed a prevalence of 33% with most children having only 1 or 2 lesions with no gender predilection. Prevalence rates within this study demonstrated a 15% prevalence in 4-year-old school children rising significantly to 44% in 11-year-olds. Within this cohort, 59% of children exclusively had plantar lesions, with 13% showing hand and foot involvement. Warts were more common in Caucasian than non-Caucasian children. Interestingly, barefoot activities and swimming pool visits did not increase the risk of developing warts. In other works conducted on children with warts, additional risk factors identified included Caucasian skin type, sharing shoes, coming from a large family, having a father who was a manual worker and having siblings or classmates with warts. Regional geographical variations in incidence were also noted in a UK study of schoolchildren. Data on prevalence rates in older children and young adults are scarce, but 1 study of over 15,000 Chinese college students suggested a prevalence of around 1.4%. The presence of verrucae in a group of children with rheumatological disease showed a prevalence no higher than the prevalence in healthy children, even though most were known to be taking immune-modifying medication. Lesions in these patients were no more numerous or atypical compared to other children.

HPV Type and Carriage of Infection

Cutaneous warts are caused by small DNA viruses which have adapted to infect the skin and mucosal surfaces. Over 450 species have been identified amongst the 5 genera of the HPV viruses (alpha, beta, gamma, mu, and nu), based on genotyping of the L1 capsid gene. The HPV virus responsible for cutaneous warts can be routinely detected from normal skin swabs in children. However, skin swabs of wart-free skin are more frequently positive in children who have warts elsewhere. The sole of the foot has been found to show highest positivity for wart virus carriage on normal skin in a pediatric population.

Few studies have investigated the most common HPV sub-types responsible for causing cutaneous warts. Researchers in the Netherlands selected 31 children (age 10–12 years) from 3 schools who were medically diagnosed with warts on the hands and feet. Skin swabs taken from their lesions and samples were analyzed for the presence of HPV DNA using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test assay capable of being detected in 23 known HPV types. In total, HPV was detected in 92% of warts. In 40 plantar lesions, the most common sub-types were HPV 2, HPV 27, HPV 57, and HPV 63 (but HPV 1, HPV 4, HPV 10, HPV 41, HPV 65, HPV 88, and HPV 95 were also detected). A small number demonstrated multiple HPV strains within the same lesion. These findings broadly concur with a Spanish study which exclusively genotyped plantar warts (n = 105) which were all positive for 1 HPV subtype. The most prevalent genotype was HPV 57 (37.1%), followed by HPV 27 (23.8%), HPV 1a (20.9%), HPV 2 (15.2%), and HPV 65 (2.8%). In children under 11 years of age HPV 1a was the most prevalent type. Tomson and colleagues in their 2011 study reported HPV types 2, 27, and 57 as being the most common cause of plantar lesions.

Figure 1. Dermoscopy of a debrided plantar wart showing a frog spawn like appearance with white halos, with capillaries at the center of the lesion.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of warts is predominantly clinical, visual analysis of the lesion being the most common method, particularly as the cost of genotyping using PCR precludes its use in regular day-to-day practice in many countries. In children, there are few differential diagnoses that may mimic plantar warts. A study undertook development of a visual assessment tool to assist clinicians in the identification of cutaneous warts. The CWARTS tool, published in 2018, was developed to test inter-observer agreement on 9 clinical features of warts. Good inter- and intra-observer agreement was achieved with the presence of black dots within the lesion having the highest agreement amongst observers and a latter publication showed it to be the strongest predictor of HPV presence within a lesion.

In recent years, the use of dermoscopy has increased in the assessment and recognition of skin lesions. Dermatoscopic evaluation of the visual features of warts has been undertaken. Observable reported features in warts include the presence of dots and globules—these can be red, brown, or black in color and probably represent dilated capillaries. These capillaries are situated at the center of white halos giving a frog spawn like appearance (Figure 1). In some lesions, abrupt interruption of the natural dermatoglyphics is easily observable under the polarized light of the dermatoscope. Callus, a common differential diagnosis on the sole, lacks the typical dots and globules seen in warts whilst there is no interruption in the natural dermatoglyphics (Figure 2). In addition, callus displays central reddish to bluish structureless pigmentation.

Natural Wart Regression

It is well established that cutaneous warts and verrucae may undergo spontaneous regression—the underlying mechanisms responsible for this are not fully understood however several observational studies of warts in children have reported spontaneous clearance. A follow-up study of 364 children (age 11) with warts discovered only 7% had them by age 16—demonstrating a 93% regression rate. A Dutch study of 366 schoolchildren diagnosed with warts reported 50% of subjects were wart-free within a year. In addition, a younger age and non-Caucasian ethnicity was shown to favor faster resolution. In a further study by the same authors, it was demonstrated that the HPV subtype of plantar warts influenced outcomes following treatment, particularly for children with the HPV1 type. HPV1 induced plantar lesions were more likely to regress with no treatment versus HPV 2, HPV 27, HPV 57 (58% versus 7%). Moreover, following treatment with salicylic acid the HPV1 type was more likely to respond to treatment than HPV2, HPV 27, and HPV 57 types (92% versus 25%). This work suggests that wart typing may allow optimization of treatment as identification of the plantar warts caused by HPV 1 type have an 8-fold chance of spontaneous regression. Other HPV types causing plantar lesions may confer more resistance to treatment, but this warrants further investigation.

Treatment of Warts in Children

In the last 10 years there have been several systematic reviews undertaken investigating wart treatments and outcomes. Some have focused exclusively on plantar lesions; others have included all types of cutaneous warts. Other reviews have pooled adults and pediatric data in their analyses or have looked exclusively at pediatric data. These reviews have uncovered areas of uncertainty in many aspects of wart treatment and have renewed calls for more research to investigate suitable treatment regimens using robust methodologies.

Figure 2. Dermoscopy of callus showing a central featureless reddish area.

In 2014, a published systematic review by Loo and Tang examined the effectiveness of various cutaneous wart treatments in adults and children concluding that topical salicylic acid showed benefit with cryotherapy and immunotherapy showing less convincing evidence of effectiveness. Other therapies such as bleomycin, photodynamic therapy, duct tape, surgical excisions, lasers, and candida antigen had unknown effectiveness. Similar guidelines published in the same year from the British Association of Dermatologists echoed the findings, concluding that most evidence of effectiveness for salicylic acid over cryotherapy with other therapies needing more investigation to draw conclusions. Within this paper it was also reported that plantar warts were likely to show reduced levels of responses compared to cutaneous warts elsewhere on the skin, reporting response rates to salicylic acid and cryotherapy of just over 30% for plantar lesions.

Systematic reviews of the treatment of warts in children specifically are lacking. Warts in children are known to regress more quickly than in adults, which may give different efficacy rates to adults. In addition, younger patients may be less tolerant of painful interventions limiting the available treatment options. In 2020, a review of topical treatments for cutaneous warts in children was published, reviewing 38 published papers from 1969 – 2021. Papers were only included if they held specific pediatric data but excluded case series and case reports. A wide range of interventions were included and detailed, but no systematic analysis was performed. The authors conclude with a suggested algorithm for children and adolescents suggesting plantar lesions in younger or uncooperative children should be approached with a “watch and wait” approach or salicylic acid-based preparations. Older children may be treated with a similar approach, but cryotherapy could also be employed as an alternative. Stubborn lesions failing these modalities may be considered for third-line treatments such as immunotherapies or laser treatment where less evidence of effectiveness exists.

Treatment of Plantar Warts (Verrucae)

A recent systematic review by Hekmatjah et al focused exclusively on studies reporting treatments for plantar warts. The authors only included studies which had 100 or more subjects. A total of 9 studies involving 1557 patients (adults and children) met their inclusion criteria. The review found most research published around salicylic acid (in various concentrations and in some studies compounded with other agents), cryotherapy (with a small number reporting the use of carbon dioxide), and pulses dye lasers. They concluded that salicylic acid showed broadly similar outcomes to cryotherapy but was more cost-effective. In addition, there was modest evidence that lasers may demonstrate positive benefit but evidence for many other modalities was lacking (curettage, cautery, photodynamic therapy, intralesional injections and zinc therapy).

A systematic review published in 2022 by Garcia-Oreja et al reviewed randomized controlled trials involving cryotherapy of plantar warts (including patients of all ages). A total of 14 papers met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated (1084 patients, average patient age was 27 years). The review included comparisons of differing cryotherapy regimes (method of application, timings, etc.) and trials comparing cryotherapy with other treatments (40% trichloroacetic acid, duct tape, carbon dioxide laser, 10% formaldehyde, adapalene gel, radio frequency ablation, salicylic acid, Nd:YAG laser, and acyclovir). The work concluded that there was no evidence to suggest that cryotherapy was either superior or inferior.

Another study, published earlier in 2020 also by Garcia-Oreja et al, systematically reviewed topical treatments for plantar warts including patients of all ages. The review showed that traditional first-line and second-line treatments such as salicylic acid and cryotherapy showed lower rates of effectiveness for plantar lesions concurring with the earlier review by Sterling et al. The authors suggest that an alternative approach may be required, such as immunotherapies with intralesional treatments. However, firm conclusions could not be drawn, as despite more impressive cure rates, the data was drawn from lower-level studies such as case series, prompting the call for more robust research into these treatments.

As the above reviews have highlighted, intralesional treatment for pediatric warts may have a place as a third-line treatment for more resistant lesions, particularly for the less responsive plantar warts. For natural clearance of warts, it is generally accepted that cell-mediated immunity is required. Immunity is facilitated through both innate and adaptive pathways within the skin. Intralesional immunotherapies increase host cell ability to recognize and eradicate HPV infection by facilitating cell-mediated immunity. One review qualitatively evaluated studies which included the use of Candida antigen, the Mumps-Measles-Rubella vaccine (MMR), Tuberculin (purified protein derivative [PPD]) or Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) as a an intralesional injection. A total of 20 studies were identified (which included adult data).  Complete resolution rates ranged from 39%–88% for candida, 26%–92% for MMR, 23.3%–94.4% for PPD, and 33.3%–39.7% for BCG. One study did show higher clearance rates in its younger patients (MMR and PPD). Local side effects for these treatments include injection pain or burning sensation or blistering whilst use of these agents have caused edema, fever, and myalgia in some cases.

The HPV vaccine has been available for several years to protect against oncogenic strains of the HPV responsible for the majority of genital and anal cancers. Case reports have been published reporting cutaneous wart clearance following vaccination with the quadrivalent vaccine (Gardasil®) which is active against HPV strains 6, 11, 16, and 18. Following this, a study of 6 children with warts persisting for more than 2 years (which had failed other therapies) was undertaken. They received 3 intramuscular injections of the vaccine at 0, 2, and 6 months. At 8 months, all lesions had regressed. Whilst a promising result, the authors highlighted how the response was probably age related, as older children and adults who had received the same treatment latterly showed disappointing response rates. They postulated that the response was more apparent in pre-pubescent children. With the beginning of puberty, the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecule of the HPV-infected cells disappears, resulting in a decrease in the vaccine-induced HPV-specific cytotoxic T-cell immune response. This could have been a factor explaining the age-dependent therapeutic response to the vaccine.

Emerging Treatments

The HPV vaccine has been available for several years to protect against oncogenic strains of the HPV responsible for the majority of genital and anal cancers. Although previous authors have remarked on the scant progress in efficacy for wart treatments in the last few decades, with a lack of new treatments, new therapeutic approaches are being developed clinically. Research in recent decades has focused on the effects of heating tissue to around 41–44 degrees centigrade (termed the hyperthermic range) which is non-lethal to cells but has been shown to promote immune function within tissues. Previous work has established that wart persistence exists due to mechanisms induced by HPV infection that down regulate antigen processing and presentation, suppressing the normal immune response. Heating tissues to within the hyperthermic range has been shown to elicit the release of Heat Shock Proteins (HSP) from cells which have several immune-promoting effects, including maturation and migration of Langerhans cells, particularly in HPV infected skin, increasing cytokine and interferon release. Clinically, increased clearance of plantar warts has been observed in a randomized controlled trial where 54% of the hyperthermia treated group resolved, as opposed to just 12% in the placebo arm. Similarly, a study of 29 warts treated with controlled heating or placebo favored the former (86% resolution versus 41% of untreated lesions).

Clinically, the use of hyperthermia by way of a microwave device has shown benefit in the treatment of plantar warts. In the laboratory, a study of the effects of the microwave device on skin explants showed increased antigen presenting cell activity and presentation to CD8+ T cells and increased γ-interferon release. A clinical study undertaken by the author treated 54 treatment-resistant warts in 32 adults. Following 4 treatments, a clearance of 75.1% (41 warts) of lesions was noted. Further clinical research is currently underway.

Summary

Cutaneous warts affect a significant number of children with limited evidence of effective treatment in this patient group. The most recent systematic reviews report little change in the last 20 years in the evidence base, with topical treatments such as salicylic acid and cryotherapy being the most studied. These show moderate effectiveness in pediatric and adult populations. Newer treatment modalities such as injection or immunotherapies and microwave heating show promise but further robust research is required to ensure effectiveness in this population group.

Ivan Bristow, PhD, FFP, RCPS (Glasg) is a podiatrist, academic, and authorin the United Kingdom. He has worked for more than 30 years in the profession, specializing in podiatric dermatology.  Follow his blog at foot.expert/blog.

To Learn More… Visit lerEXPO.com

To hear Dr. Bristow discuss this study in further detail, visit lerEXPO.com: go to Events; click on past events and scroll down to New Frontiers in Dermatology: Warts, IPKs & Microwave Therapy, sponsored by Swift. There you’ll find not only Dr. Bristow’s talk, but also “Warts: Condition Profile,” by Tracy Vlahovic, DPM, FFPM, FCPS (Glasg), in which she explores the condition profile for warts and what makes HPV such a challenging virus to treat effectively and with consistency. This program, including the talk by Robert Conenello, DPM, FACFAS (see page 43) is approved for 2.0 CME.